The face model did not change anything on an analog test photo. ![]() On my 17 Teraflop Radeon Pro W6800 it takes 3 seconds (2 seconds for resize) for 1% point. HitPaw, accepts only internet file types. I’ve complained about this and many others have for over a year now, with no change or response from Topaz. There has to be more efficient way to code and deliver smaller installation than right now. The Topaz products keep getting larger in size and not proportionally improving in their ability to deliver more. That is six times the size for same or lesser results. ![]() By comparison with all the models and everything GigaPixel is about 6 GB. By comparison HitPaw AI is maybe now 800 MB download with three good AI models to choose from. My point was that Topaz is releasing large applications, lots of bugs, and somewhat frustrating User interface that keeps changing and pricing structure that is not super clear and also some of their products like Mask AI is abandoned it seems, and that makes people trust the company less. There have been threads about Tiopaz and need to add better face reconstructions of small faces, but so far Topaz have not implemented it. In normal, high res clean images, it delivers similar results to Topaz, some better, some worse, depending on the image, but on average very comparable. So far I’ve tried every AI enlarger that is commercial, didn’t code one myself, but all the commercial options, HitPaw AI new model for reconstructing faces, is so far the best, and superior to Topaz with examples where there are small or blurry faces. I guess the downside is no Mac version, but perhaps they are planing it. So far I’ve seen quite a few similar Online AI photo enhancers, but HitPaw AI has three models now and one it tries to make itself different by being offline app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |